Wikipedia

• Can be accurate, anyone can edit so some info can be false
• Newer entries are going to be less refined and less factual
• Due to the easiness of editing, strong, bias viewpoint can occur that distort the truth
• Unacceptable for all academic institutions
• Check sources
• Wikipedia should be used as a starting point
• Wikipedia should be used carefully, not copied as points can be false

Pros

1. Quick information
2. A lot of information on subjects
3. Millions of subjects
4. Large amount of editors and writers - kept up to date, quick corrections etc.
5. Hyperlinks are useful to understand subjects because smaller points can be expand

Cons

1. Easy to edit so there is vandalism, can be when there is a big edit going on
2. Subtle vandalism can be missed by editors
3. Some pages are incomplete or are not good quality
4. Editors and writers sometimes do not give their sources
5. 
   

Only the first two of the video of the week are the right ones

Video of the Week

In an earlier post I mentioned a video with a link, I have posted 4 here on the bottom of the page so u can watch and stay on the site. I will update this panel once a week on Saturdays

Web Browsers

The first web browser was created by Tim Berners-Lee and it was calle the WorldWideWeb but was later renamed to Nexus
The first commercially successful web browser was created by Marc Andreessen and was called Mosaic

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo0Cazxj_yc I found this awesome video showing lots of people with amazing talents. Hope you enjoy.

Goal Line Technology in the Barclays Premier League should be included because I find it unfair that a goal could be given even if it did not go in or a goal disallowed to due to a bad decision. Other camera technology should be included as well for example a camera to check offsides.